On
October 4th the Trustee filed a motion for a writ of attachment-link
on unspecified assets of the above defendants. He used Reed's
plea bargain -link
and a declaration against Tony Hitchman as support-link(see
important last page) He was successful in getting an attachment
of the assets of Tony Hitchman who now lives in South Africa.
Mr. Hitchman is appealing his attachment and he along with
the above defendants will appear in a legal sense on Dec 20th
in Bankruptcy court in Santa Barbara. The judge must find
that it is "more likely than not"
that the trustee will prevail in his case for the judge to
rule in the trustee's favor.. Writs are almost never heard
of in fraudulent transfer cases, but one has been issued against
Tony Hitchman already so they are in fact quite possible.
The countervailing legal arguments revolve around the necessity
to identify and trace assets. The trustee's argument goes
to the untracabilility of pure cash. Defendants have responded
with forensic evidence to show Reed was not running a Ponzi
because of significant business activity, multiple successful
ventures and the possession of more co-mingled assets after
13 years than net monies entrusted to him. A Ponzi scheme
by definition is never solvent. See "Ponzi
Scheme?" Copy of Trustee's Motion for writ-link.
The significance of this action
is that with assets for defense and living and college education
frozen, great pressure can be brought to settle. The trustee's
move is a brilliant legal move, using the Hitchman writ success
as a template. He would prove the judge willing to allow attachments
and then could negotiate with subsequent parties saying that
if they do not cooperate, he would file against them as well.
With similar facts the judge is unlikely to rule differently
in subsequent cases. If the trustee wins the Partial Summary
Judgment on Fraudulent Intent
in combination with the threat of writ, the trustee could
force settlement before discovery.
Dec 20th will be a very significant
date in this proceeding. Will Riblett reverse the writ attachment
on Hitchman or will she uphold it and order it on the remaining
defendants. |